From Nothing to Everything

Nothing says Something to Everything, Everything doesn't respond since Eveything can't understand Nothing. Nothing says Something again, and again, Everything doesn't repond. But then Nothing says to Eveything, if you can hear me, pretend that you can't. And everything goes on, as if nothing wasn't there at all. Now the question is, did Everything hear nothing or did it not? since Everything is exihibiting the same behaviour as it would if it acually heard nothing at all, but is then the same behaviour it would react with, if it did infact heard something.

So this gives us an interesting situation. Replace "saying" with interacting. Now the question is, if Nothing "somehow" interacts with something, then there would be no sign of that interaction, displayed by Everything. So the way to know if there is an interaction happening somehow is to go beyond a layer and see that in fact there is an effect here due to some interaction that came from Nothing. But then if we explain it as, this effect was there to begin with, then we must go another layer down to see that there is indeed a difference here, that cannnot be explained by the layer above it, as it acts like there was no interaction whatsoever, and therefore this layer is what's being interacted with. Then if we say, these properties that this layer exhibits were they to begin with and wasn't the result of any some interaction that came from Nothing, then we can go another layer further down.

Now replace nothing and everything with the quantifiable and the unquantifiable. Unquantifiable is Nothing where seemingly something comes out of and the unquantifiable is the Everything we see and hear and touch.

So this paradox, observes the quantification problem that I keep running into, specifically, where does it happen and NOT how it happens. So where does it happen then? it happens in all layers and it keeps going down and down without an end, which means quantum mechanics will not be as further down as we can go, and there will be other layers which will not make sense even in the sense of quantum physics. Which is a widely accepted concept.

So the answer to the ultimate question is to explain how this quantification came to be, not at what level. But indeed, the leves themselves are important, since we cannot understand that there is indeed something interacting with everything from nothing, without first seeing this effect in the layers below, since the evidence manifests itself as non-evidence there.

So what we need to find is this "something" that's been used to interact with everything by nothing, it can be a what, or a how, I believe it is more so a how than a what, but indeed, we must keep both options open.