Dreaming and thoughts and death

I was recently solving some chess puzzles online and something wierd happened. I was really sleepy as it was late but I was determined to solve how many ever as I could so I kept on trying to. And at somepoint I forgot about the puzzel infront of me and I started instead making up my own thing. I started drawing on the chess board using arrows and I started taking pieces where ever I wanted without any regards to the laws of chess.

There I discovered something. When your brain activity gets low (I was really sleepy, at around 4am as it was very well past my bed time, although more experimentation needs to be done, perhaps with phychedilics since we know that they indeed lower brain activity) the rules that you once held start disappearing andd your reality becomes whatever you make it to be. And if there is a subtle thought in the subconscious that hold on to some sort of a version of reality, (hence why I started drawing on the chess board using it's own arrows), then the disappearing of most of those laws combined with what little exists, adds up to all these seemingly illogical things we see. But we know for a fact that they are not illogical since we can then imagine a scenario where it could be true, like non euclidean geometry.

So combine this effect with lack of sensory input and boom, dreams. And I believe there is no way to actually achieve this state and still be connected to this reality. Since once you loose all logic, and become unquantifable, there is no logic I can think about that would then connect you to this reality again. As I discussed in a previous post about how it doesn't make sense to truly put a boundary on something that inherently lacks boundaries, it is hence why I cannot (perhaps yet) see the logic in how we can "come back" after we achieve this. Perhaps we achieve this when we die...

But from a physicalis perspective and this is as valid, we could say as those laws of nature disappeards from the mind, what remains is what gives the idea of different realities, as then those combines lack of logic and the logic that remains it make up things but it suggests that we cannot truly imagine things beyond some for of logic that we can grasp. Even the things I talked abut in "non logic" blog post, though it maybe beyond grasp, we can imagine it. But "grasping" is BASED on this reality. which then begs the question (in physicalist perspective) where to draw the line between the quantifiable and the not.

So, Do we draw the line between the mind and sperate reality or do we draw it in between reality and something else but something that's explorable through mind? But if it's from a physicalist point of view, we would have to explore it using the laws of reality since we are bound to it.

We must first think and do the unthinkibale or the undoable to prove this physicalistic perspective wrong, but then the question becomes, since you thought it or did it, do rules of reality allow you to do it?