A take on Death and the End

While thinking of ending we seem to run into a conclusion where we don't know if ending is really ending or if it is some kind of another begining of sorts. So I try to explain to myself waht ending and death really is.

think of a set x = {1,2,3,4,5, ... , n}, x = life and existence. now, do we know what x is precisely? no. do we know how many variables there is in x? no. but can we get rid of x through some process. yes, abosultely. it might contain properties where known equations just end up changing the set into a different set but can we get rid of it? yes. erase it. so there can be an end even to something where ending doesn't seem real. but from the perspective of the set, it can't even imagine being erased. because it exists in a world of math and functions and algorithmic outputs. it can't even being to imagine what erasing is. just like that we are the set. erasing is death. and it can go on and on forever, but since this was a metaphor it didn't fully capture the essence of it. but from this we can understand that there is a state, where this reality ends. and how what comes after is unthinkable. therefore death and ending exists within the laws set by this reality.

So in end is something that this reality can experience. not necessarily something that can be explained in all other realms of thought and idea. So since "end" is bounded by a st of laws that allows something to either begin or end, there could be other non things that doesn't have a begining or an end the way we describe it, or in anyway we can describe it.

A realm where bieng is non being and begining is end and the end is the begining. Perhaps a realm where only end exists, or somewhere only begining exists. It doesn't make sense to us as these realms would not follow the laws of this reality we live in. Therefore it could be there or it couldn't, the chance is that either is as likely as the other.